Kef ls50 meta vs r3 reddit - It would make sense for that to coincide with a Meta release.

 
They come with a five year warranty. . Kef ls50 meta vs r3 reddit

I just wanted to double check, based on my room, what would be the best choice. 0 x 337. Last edited Sunday at 758 AM. This option gives more flexibility but limits me to choose only Marantz power-amp. The KEF R3, however, is merely decent when compared to its direct competitors. The plan is to upgrade to a Rega Planar 1 Plus (Has inbuilt Phono stage) and then pair it with the Powernode 2 and KEF LS50 Metas. Also listened to Dynaudio Evoke 20s but it did not shine next to the Arias, with Dynaudio passive bookshelves I would not consider anything less than the Special 40. I had to build a new desk to make the space they deserved, so I bought a slab of solid Wenge then stained with Danish oil. There's a slight compromise with on-wall surround or height usage as a result, but it still works well enough that we support this config. Even the best tower speakers only go flat to about 30Hz. Kef ls50 meta vs ls50 wireless 1 TheMadcap Sep 25, 2022 Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion Replies 7 Views 2K Sep 26, 2022 TheMadcap T D Focal Diablo utopia vs kef r3 vs kef reference 1 Deleted member 51459 Sep 26, 2022 Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion 3 4 5 Replies 85 Views 7K Oct 17,. Unleashing the Full Potential of KEF LS50 Meta. Hi, I measured the KEF R3 meta loudspeakers this time. Not sure why KEF have such wildly varying prices from one country to the nextbut your decision may. Mar 12, 2023 Even if the drivers were the best on the planet, and the crossover perfect, the KEF R3 Meta would still be better. I&39;ve had both and I . The laws of physics kick in when you crank up the volume. Dec 27, 2020 Messages 1,629 Likes 796 Nov 3, 2021 81 tecnogadget said Nowhere, people just love to make assumptions bases on nothing. The meta is more flexible for sure but I suspect much more expensive once you add in amplification. You will need a decent amplifier to get the best out of them as they are not super sensitive at 87 db, but when you pair these with an amp or home theater receiver that can provide good current, they are a super impressive bookshelf speaker. ly2ZUaeIlCross the Streams httpsyoutu. No waveguide. There are several reviewers who directly compared the LS50 to the LS50 Meta and said they could not perceive any difference. The setup sounds a bit funny (hollow) compared to my other setup (Teac AX-505 PSB T20). Absolutely yes imo. Apr 3, 2021 Don&39;t get me wrong, the R3 are wonderful performers across the range, but the LS50 Meta are just that much better. You get ability to play much louder and with much better distortion handling. I have the KEF R3s and SVS SB1000 sub. 99 at Best Buy 1,599. LSXs are deceptively big sounding - would fill the room no problem. Kef LS50 Meta vs Focal Aria 906's review I started reading and watching the reviews on the net regarding the new Kef LS50 Meta. Update w postaci Meta przy modelu LS50 okaza si gigantycznym sukcesem i wietnym posunic. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. Last edited Sunday at 758 AM. , KEF , (3) . Next upgrade might be the ifi streamer so I don&39;t need to have my TV on all the time. Gave them about a month to break in though Im not a big believer In that. The LS50s, even the Meta, are a bit of a Marmite speaker. I realize they aren&39;t the Q350&39;s but I have also compared the Meta&39;s to the reference 1 and I like the metas over them a lot as well. hits harder and tighter than the ls50 meta. In that interview the guy from kef said that the q100s were before they worked on the ls50, and the q150s are after, and they used everything they learned from the ls50 to make the q150s. Audiovector QR1 vs KEF LS50 Meta. There is no contest at the same price point, the latter pairing blows away the R3 in every way imaginable (but requires a great deal more care in setting upplacement). Let me know your recommendations You don&39;t need to worry how low any of them go if you have a sub. LSXs are deceptively big sounding - would fill the room no problem. KEF&39;s LS50 loudspeaker was introduced in 2012 to celebrate the English manufacturer&39;s 50th anniversary. Did I need to do this No. TheMadcap; Sep 25, 2022; Speaker Reviews,. Home Theater upgrade. I was about to pull the trigger on KEF R3, because they sound wonderful and my living room is pretty big (30 sqm or 323 sqft), so I think they would be a nice fit. Aug 31, 2021. Looks pretty compelling 220 WPC into 4 Ohms, Roon Ready, and HDMI eARC. I do not have any other option than to choose this. The 11Hz -3dB figure quoted assumes both lower volumes a room gain. KC62 and R3 Metas - First impressions - Way boomier mids, etc. I have to admit that at first I was very excited and happy, but now I&39;m frustrated and a bit discouraged. My personal opinion is they absolutely need a sub, which is easier buy when you got such a deal on LS50&39;s. Seattle Area. KEF LS50 Meta compared to KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF LS50 Wireless 2. Usually, anniversary models are large, floorstanding "statement" designs with a price to match, but the LS50 was a minimonitor, priced at 1500pair. The r3 definitely wins without a sub, but thats not shocking either. Positioning may be causing the bass boom and nothing beats posting a photograph of the speakers in their current positions. hits harder and tighter than the ls50 meta. Since Zeos is probably one of the few people to have heard both of the speakers and it is a major. Bought the kef ls50 meta about a month ago. Speakers KEF R11. The LS50s, even the Meta, are a bit of a Marmite speaker. The Meta&39;s in that configuration are my absolute favorite. Feb 20, 2023. The main changes I&39;ve seen using the LS50 50Meta is that the frequency response was much more linear (though the R3 was already pretty good in this regard) and the horizontal dispersion was a bit wider. That goes for both Wireless 1 and 2&39;s. 25 driver is crossed over at 350-400Hz. KEF LS50 Meta loudspeaker. Such as adding updated meta and tweeter modules to the R3, or simply making the LS50 Meta larger and beefing up its woofer a bit to run better down to 60 Hz. It is a remarkable little speaker that delivers some of the best performance Ive seen for a speaker in this price range without DSP. The base plate on the S2 is just too narrow to stably. Nov 21, 2022; Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion; Replies 8 Views 2K. After some playing around with sub. 0 as I am in an apartment and dont want to be that guy) Room as in the attached images. Focal "S906" doesn&39;t exist. Mar 12, 2023 Even if the drivers were the best on the planet, and the crossover perfect, the KEF R3 Meta would still be better. Deleted member 188516. If you&39;re considering Bookshelf Speakers in the 780 range, you might want to check out some better options. No lows whatsoever. Most but not all people agree the MetasLS50s need a lot of power to sound their best. The bass is one of the more impressive things about the R3, especially compared to KEF&39;s uber-popular passive LS50, which was known to be . 3 meters. Truly they sound incredible. Kef LS50,Q200C, Q100, Kube 10B (X2) , Denon AVR-X3400H, Emotiva A-300, Hisense 50" Q8G 4K , Xbox One S. So, even if you sub a Meta, that hollow 5. I have had the OG LS50. It is a revision of the original LS50 which has been a huge hit for KEF in the eight years it has been on sale. KEF R3 VS LS50 - Which do I think is the best speaker for the money In this video I review the Kef R3 and the KEF LS50 speakers. Seriously, for home theater the LS50 Meta dont stand a chance against the R3. Analysis The KEF LS50 Meta has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform their own hands-on testing, such as The Independent, What Hi-Fi, and Gear Patrol - it was awarded the "Best Bookshelf speaker for clarity" title by The Independent, "Ranked 1 out of 12" by What Hi-Fi, and "Ranked 2 out of 33" by Gear. I also noticed that KEF&39;s website says the new S3 stand for the R3 will be available Dec 22. Since the first time I listen to KEF ls 50 wireless ii 2 speakers. Overall it looks real good as you'd expect from Kef. 0 x 337. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. Once you EQ the LS50 they are as good as Meta. AVR Denon X4400H 5. LS50 Meta features a 1" Aluminum Hard-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5. 0 x 199. I have the Cambridge CX81 and am not satisfied. Then I listened to the R3, and it obviously offers a different sound. Similar concept with the horn loaded compression driver. I say that, even being a fan of the R3. ago You are def paying for the aesthetics they offer and I think thats fine. 5inch 2 and base area of the KEF LS50 Meta is approximately 564. Kef ls50 meta vs ls50 wireless 1. Aria 906 does. The laws of physics kick in when you crank up the volume. 98 Analysis The KEF LS50 Meta is a great choice for people with a 1,300 budget. In terms of the size, build quality and driver sizes, the R3 Meta is pretty much exactly the same as the previous model. The Meta&39;s in that configuration are my absolute favorite. You&39;ll have smoother mid bass to bass transition. CzeDzisiaj przedstawiamy Wam najnowsz seri od KEFa - R Meta. Apr 3, 2021 Don&39;t get me wrong, the R3 are wonderful performers across the range, but the LS50 Meta are just that much better. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. My friend has LS50W (non meta) and they sound fantastic with no treatment or carpeting in almost same sized room. So you could get a new listening position that is like 1-1,5m away from the speaker. Go and listen to them in a shop and decide yourself. Based on the reviews the AMP inside the Wireless version is perfect with DSP and bi-amping. Active Speakers>Passive Speakers. I believe they were demo&39;d with Hegel H190. I believe that&39;s a different speaker. Usually, anniversary models are large, floorstanding "statement" designs with a price to match, but the LS50 was a minimonitor, priced at 1500pair. KEF LS50 Meta at Crutchfield for 899. He says they best Q350&39;s and even compete with LS50 and Meta. Detailed comparison of the KEF LS50 vs KEF LS50 Meta speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. To me, the non-Meta Reference UniQ is better than the R Meta UniQ. Go and listen to them in a shop and decide yourself. The laws of physics kick in when you crank up the volume. The LS50 Meta comes in different colors and I must say, it looks stunning in white. I purchased my LS50s for 899 in November 2018, and have seen similar sales since, though the price point may now be 999. The KEF R3, however, is merely decent when compared to its direct competitors. South Korea. People talking about adding a sub. It's a statement piece. Not sure what it&39;s like where you are. The LS50 Wireless II offer great value for money at their price point but I also want to consider longevity of the system as well which the LS50 Metas will provide. I can pick up a second hand KEF R2C for 500 and two second hand KEF R3 for 800. Seriously, for home theater the LS50 Meta dont stand a chance against the R3. I have owned the LS50 OG for about 6 years now, and I love them. I reviewed the Anniversary Edition LS50 in December 2012. People talking about adding a sub. The 11Hz -3dB figure quoted assumes both lower volumes a room gain. I did try the R3 Meta as fronts and I am really missing the details and openness compared with the non-Meta Reference. It has the benefit of a highly optimized 3 way coaxial design. com 499. The meta is more flexible for sure but I suspect much more expensive once you add in amplification. The LS50 Meta are now the class leader at this level 899. R3 TDAI-1120. The new Meta sounds closer to an old LS50 than any other speaker does. You&39;ll have smoother mid bass to bass transition. (If somebody would only consider Kef I would recommend the R3 over the ls50. both 85db, power range original vs Meta. Available for 2,490, the KEF LS50 Wireless 2 offer a very similar performance thanks to the use of the same Uni-Q driver and the same technologies. Aug 7, 2021. Kef R3 Meta on the other hand, builds on top of Kef R3s success. There should be at least a couple more years left. R3 replacing a 2017 pair of LS50. The LS50 borrows a lot from KEFs flagship Blade loudspeaker. Deleted member 188516. KEF R3 Meta Bookshelf Speakers - Pair. I auditioned the LS60, LS50 Meta, R3, R7 and R11 today. It has the benefit of a highly optimized 3 way coaxial design. May 19, 2020 I&39;m surprised by the comment above that suggests the LS50s sound better than the R3s. Any speaker at this price point will have tradeoffs, however. Before the KEF R300 I previously owned I did have a pair of Buchardt S300 mk2 and really enjoyed the sound of those. When I demo&39;d these I could hear great detail in the music at low volumes. 98 Analysis The KEF LS50 Meta is a great choice for people with a 1,300 budget. For folk and acoustic they are incredible, but I always felt like they were easy to . Update w postaci Meta przy modelu LS50 okaza si gigantycznym sukcesem i wietnym posunic. The LS50 already has good dampening and little resonances (around 1200Hz there is a low-level one). I&39;ve had both and I . The dac reclocks ALL inputs including coaxial and optical unlike most dacs in market. Listen especially to the drum snaps, very crisp and detailed. R3 87dB r7 88dB r11 90dB Keep in mind the red line is their axial response, for a reason which i don't know the axial response in R11 its much higher than. The 11Hz -3dB figure quoted assumes both lower volumes a room gain. The impedance graph is interesting. Did I need to do this No. While the KEF R3 can play. I auditioned the LS60, LS50 Meta, R3, R7 and R11 today. both 85db, power range original vs Meta. Or 3x new KEF LS50 Meta for 1500. Everyone agrees that class AB beats Class D all other things being equal. The bass is one of the more impressive things about the R3, especially compared to KEF&39;s uber-popular passive LS50, which was known to be . both 85db, power range original vs Meta. 3K subscribers in the KEF community. . 55kg 29. R3 vs R7 vs LS50 Meta for this room Hi guys, I&x27;ve already posted here and set my decision mostly on the R3s. It spends less of its range sounding like a speaker, and on the other extreme, a speaker straining to do its job at higher volumes. Andrew Robinson, during his video review, says the Meta version is a big improvement and gives it his speaker of the year award and gushes that it could be an end game bookshelf at any price point. Facebook Twitter Reddit. If you prefer the LS50 for the looks or form factor, that is a good enough reason to use it instead. The KEF R3, however, is merely decent when compared to its direct competitors. EACH with a matching Center. Bought the kef ls50 meta about a month ago. Even then, the R3 still matches it which is . Speakers KEF R11. Everyone agrees that class AB beats Class D all other things being equal. CzeDzisiaj przedstawiamy Wam najnowsz seri od KEFa - R Meta. The cabinet shape and size still works well, and the curved front panel made of Dough Moulding Compound a polyester resin combined with glass fibre and calcium carbonate continues to make for an impressively rigid and well-controlled foundation for the Uni-Q drive unit array. Update w postaci Meta przy modelu LS50 okaza si gigantycznym sukcesem i wietnym posunic. The white. On reddit someone quipped that it looks. Both are amazing speakers, the LS50 are about 300 cheaper per pair, but the B&W 706 are pretty amazing. Does someone has experience with them both Which one is better. (If somebody would only consider Kef I would recommend the R3 over the ls50. R3 replacing a 2017 pair of LS50. Or buy the LS50 Meta with any of the above AVR and later add MM7025 power AMP. Also our sofa is only 9 feet away from the front speakers and listen at moderate volume maximum 85db for movies. Speakers are atm around 32,5 cm from the. Add to Cart. LS50&39;s are almost 13 the price (currently 898 in Canada) of the R3&39;s so not a bad deal. From memory, because we tested the OG vs Meta back in november 2022, I can tell you I noticed the following differences The metas sound more relaxed and even more detailed. Opinions online seem rather split. If 600-800 is worth <2 difference to you, then you do you. Both need a sub if you are hoping to play at anything over moderate volumes. SUB BK P12-300SB. Some people make a strong case for LS50 Metas with sub (or the prior LS50&39;s with sub) because the LS50 Metas have been optimized for midrange whereas R3&39;s have a slight tradeoff in midrange performance to get lower deeper bass. As for hearing other KEFs, Ive listened to quite a few pairs of LS50s over the past couple of years, and I think this configuration actually beats out a couple of my friends local stores setups with more expensive amps etc, everything sounds super clean and balanced. Facebook Twitter Reddit. Thank you for watching Video If you enjoyed, Please hit the like and Subscribe This video is a sound comparison of KEF LS50 Meta & KEF Q350 bookshelf Speak. Nick V said. That means you can conceivably buy an external sub woofer as well as the bookshelf speakers for the same amount of money, and makes them the better overall value compared to the KEF R3. I&39;m having a hard time achieving a decent soundstage, and this is. This alone is worth the extra dollars. Any speaker at this price point will have tradeoffs, however. (2) SVS PB13 Ultra&x27;s for 1,000. Can someone give me an advice the ls50 meta lok very good and the reviews seems awesome, but the R3 seem to sound also very good, but the optics are not so appealing compared to the ls50 meta. Kef ls50 meta vs ls50 wireless 1. Before the KEF R300 I previously owned I did have a pair of Buchardt S300 mk2 and really enjoyed the sound of those. Approximate costs KEF LS60 KC62 9,000 LS50 Meta KC62 TDAI 1120 5,600. That's what I mean by it's not that simple. ly2ZUaeIlCross the Streams httpsyoutu. In any case, the R3 were already bigger than I wanted for my place, and they are 1. ly2ZUaeIlCross the Streams httpsyoutu. LS50 ad LS50 Metas are uncapable of R3 level output, even with a sub or two. Dynamics, sound-stage, micro details. The DSP in the treble region didn&39;t improve the level of detail, soundstaging, and imaging as it did in. Can someone give me an advice the ls50 meta lok very good and the reviews seems awesome, but the R3 seem to sound also very good, but the optics are not so appealing compared to the ls50 meta. As for hearing other KEFs, Ive listened to quite a few pairs of LS50s over the past couple of years, and I think this configuration actually beats out a couple of my friends local stores setups with more expensive amps etc, everything sounds super clean and balanced. Dec 27, 2020 Messages 1,629 Likes 796 Nov 3, 2021 81 tecnogadget said Nowhere, people just love to make assumptions bases on nothing. Sharing the same drivers as the range-topping R11 Meta, the R3 Meta is a true three-way design. san antonio texas jobs, overnight parking perth train station

Every standmount loudspeaker needs a stand. . Kef ls50 meta vs r3 reddit

(2) SVS PB13 Ultra&x27;s for 1,000. . Kef ls50 meta vs r3 reddit medical liaison salary

Based on the reviews the AMP inside the Wireless version is perfect with DSP and bi-amping. Even then, the R3 still matches it which is . To me it seemed as though the metas images slightly better or at least more consistently, and the r3 had a little more detail below 200hz (again, hardly shocking). Listen especially to the drum snaps, very crisp and detailed. Chances are it's probably as much as -30 dB at 11 hz when pushed to the max volumes, but - 3 dB to 11 hz if maxing out at 60 dB. Similar concept with the horn loaded compression driver. Frequency response. Frequency response. After manage it looking it selling my speakers and spend 4 months I buy them. This alone is worth the extra dollars. This is meant for. -Dynaudio Special 40Contour -Buchardt S400 -Sonus Faber Sonetto II -KEF LS50 Meta -Proac Was pretty locked on the Meta and maybe add a sub, but know I really don&39;t know anymore. My amp is Marantz PM7000N. There are plenty of options at that price range. Update w postaci Meta przy modelu LS50 okaza si gigantycznym sukcesem i wietnym posunic. ago removed drunkencolumnist 2 yr. Get them already haha. The company then proceeded to surprise quite a few people (myself included) with an active version. It has the benefit of a highly optimized 3 way coaxial design. In the case of MAT, Kef has created a synthetic material that can absorb unwanted sound emanating from the rear of the LS50 Metas driver, thus reducing distortion and enhancing the speakers transparency. Seriously, for home theater the LS50 Meta dont stand a chance against the R3. KEF R3 VS LS50 - Which do I think is the best speaker for the money In this video I review the Kef R3 and the KEF LS50 speakers. Aug 31, 2021. With a sub, r3 crossed at 80hz, meta at 100hz, it became splitting hairs. Ordered the Marantz PM7000n a few days ago and in the next few days I will buy speakers as well. it has higher efficiency), so because of that it probably also . R3 87dB r7 88dB r11 90dB Keep in mind the red line is their axial response, for a reason which i don't know the axial response in R11 its much higher than. TV Philips 77inch OLED 807 (Thanks AVForums and PHILIPS for this monster) Old Panasonic 65 GZ 950. Jul 22, 2021 Sonically, Meta technology hasnt caused LS50 to undergo a Jekyll-Hyde personality shift. Pawnshop123 said Hello, I am going to buy KEF R3 Meta with an amplifier and one of the SVS sb3000 subwoofer. Advertisement Coins. Sounded better for movies, blended better kc62 and . So my journey started with the 950s and ended with the R5s because my wife liked towers over speaker stands. And mercifully, KEF kept. Some folks are wondering if R3 or LS50 M is a better choice. LS50 Meta features a 1" Aluminum Hard-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5. I much prefer the LS50 Meta - just more coherent and "musical". The KEF Q350, however, while a reasonable product for 799, doesn&39;t stack up against its competitors quite as well. Was looking for some advice for deciding between the KEF LS50 meta and R3 meta to pair with a Bluesound Powernode N330. The Reference series is better value, they use a 3 way design. H happycamper820 Registered Joined Sep 2, 2019 108 Posts. Feb 20, 2023. These are going to be used in a 300 sq. Home Theater upgrade. I know the Monitor Audio go down to 35hz and are the same price as the LS50 Metas currently. The R3&39;s slew the LS50&39;s on the low end, as would be expected, and in farfield usage I don&39;t think I&39;d run the Metas without a sub, as I can the R3&39;s for most of what I listen to. The laws of physics kick in when you crank up the volume. The LS50s, even the Meta, are a bit of a Marmite speaker. The R3&39;s play louder before distorting which helps when using in larger rooms. Like the LS50 the stereo image remains stable and convincing when I move around in my listening position. I had to build a new desk to make the space they deserved, so I bought a slab of solid Wenge then stained with Danish oil. Speakers KEF R11. cdash99, Aug 23, 2021. The KEF Q350, however, while a reasonable product for 799, doesn&39;t stack up against its competitors quite as well. So you could place some real loudspeaker stands at about 70-80cm height behind your desk. 3K subscribers in the KEF community. A aarons915 Registered Joined Oct 24, 2012 2,540 Posts. As for hearing other KEFs, Ive listened to quite a few pairs of LS50s over the past couple of years, and I think this configuration actually beats out a couple of my friends local stores setups with more expensive amps etc, everything sounds super clean and balanced. You&39;ll have smoother mid bass to bass transition. At least that is a big part of its marketing and pulls customers. Oct 10, 2021 LS50 at 86 and 96 dB THD (0. to really hear these, you simply have to hear them in person. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. Also, dialogs are muddled. Designer of Silver 5L - Equipment list on About. No lows whatsoever. I can get the Audiovector used for about half price and I usually like AMT from trying Adam, ELac and Martin Logan. They are fantastic speakers. although this waveguide looks more JBL305. The laws of physics kick in when you crank up the volume. Even without the EQ. KEF is having a sale right now, and the R3&39;s are almost the same price as the LS50 Meta&39;s and the LSX II. Dynamics, sound-stage, micro details. Many users compare them to other speakers they have owned or listened to, and some prefer the sound of other models. The truth is, you can&39;t go wrong with either the R3&39;s or LS50 Metas. For now this is my setup, perhaps its decidedly not audiophile and if thats the case my apologies. (If somebody would only consider Kef I would recommend the R3 over the ls50. I e owned the silver 100 and two sets of ls50 and now the meta, meta are more revealing yet smoother, they&39;re also better balanced, the MA are . Which brings up the next question. Kef ls50 meta vs ls50 wireless 1. This remained saved as a draft. Detailed comparison of the KEF LS50 vs KEF LS50 Meta speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. KEF LS50 Meta Key Specs 2-way Design 12th Generation Uni-Q Driver 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter 5. Very close call, in the end KEF Metas SVS SB1000Pro fit the budget very nicely. 1 So I am looking to upgrade my three front speakers and am wondering what would work best 3 KEF LS50 Meta or 3 KEF R3 all my surround speakers are KEF LS50 first generation. I&39;ve heard the ls50 and Silver 100, and would. It is also, comparatively, a little rough around the edges. 6 to 5. I listen to a lot of metal, however, and when I do things seem to get lost and fall apart a bit. 0 x 199. they cost more than twice the LS50 Metas (I wish that didn&39;t bother me, but it does). My original LS50 wireless wont turn on anymore. KEF R3. both 85db, power range original vs Meta. It doesn't feel like I have a sub but that the metas are transformed into something that makes my ears and my eyes unable to reconcile what I'm experiencing. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. Kef R3 Meta on the other hand, builds on top of Kef R3s success. Like the LS50 the stereo image remains stable and convincing when I move around in my listening position. . In this Colorado home the changes can&x27;t be seen where we kitted out the space with a series of Wisdom Sage line source arrays, massive STS series subs and a new head end. 3 floor standing speakers with svs sb 2000 pro sub, rega p3 and rogue sphinx v3 Integrated amp. KEF LS50 or Harbeth P3ESR for desktop system Currently Spendor S35 SVS SB-1000 sub McCormack modified Micro Power Drive McCormack Micro Line Drive HRT Music Streamer II DAC connected to the PC AQ cabling Speakers are 5' apart on the desk. From memory, because we tested the OG vs Meta back in november 2022, I can tell you I noticed the following differences The metas sound more relaxed and even more detailed. LS50 Meta features a 1" Aluminum Hard-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5. I can pick up a second hand KEF R2C for 500 and two second hand KEF R3 for 800. I say that, even being a fan of the R3. CzeDzisiaj przedstawiamy Wam najnowsz seri od KEFa - R Meta. Now, imagine the improvements that we got from LS50 -> LS50 Meta, where preference score went from 4. The LS50 Meta are now the class leader at this level 899. The meta are not even five years old in production yet. 12" tweeter. KEF R3 Meta at Crutchfield for 2,199. 16 days ago. Especially as it's a very practical option for some listening rooms. Meta has produced a more open, more transparent version of the original. Every standmount loudspeaker needs a stand. The specs they list of the sub are not attainable at full volume, not the least of which below the resonant frequency you need a 4x the power for every octave to push the speaker to xmas. New Metas arrived today (connected to Bluesound Powernode) and Im shocked by how much better they sound than the original Ls50s. pdfIntro Music by Roof - 'So So'Li. . craigslist yakima cars